Heart Branch Block Reading From an Ekg

Continuing Education Activity

Correct bundle branch block (RBB) is an electrocardiogram finding resulting in a widened QRS and electrocardiographic vector changes. Although usually beneficial, this finding can represent underlying myocardial disease and is a predictor of mortality in certain patient populations. This action reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology and EKG changes seen in right bundle branch block.

Objectives:

• Explicate the etiology of a correct bundle branch block.

• Summarize the characteristic electrocardiogram findings for right bundle branch block.

• Describe concrete examination findings potentially associated with correct bundle branch blocks.

• Outline interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to advance detection and proper management of right package branch blocks.

Admission gratis multiple selection questions on this topic.

Introduction

Right package branch block (RBBB) is an electrocardiogram finding that occurs when the physiologic electrical conduction organisation of the middle, specifically in the His-Purkinje system, is altered or interrupted resulting in a widened QRS and electrocardiographic vector changes. The bundle of His divides in the interventricular septum into the correct and left packet branches. Initially, the right bundle co-operative off of the bundle of His travels down the interventricular septum nearly the endocardium. It so dives deeper into the muscular layer before re-emerging near the endocardium once again. The right bundle branch receives nearly of its blood supply from the anterior descending coronary artery. Information technology as well receives collateral apportionment from the right or left circumflex coronary arteries, depending on the dominance of the heart.[1]

Correct bundle branch block is associated with structural changes from stretch or ischemia to the myocardium.[2] It can likewise occur iatrogenically from sure common cardiac procedures, such equally right heart catheterization.[3] Although in that location is no significant clan with cardiovascular risk factors, the presence of a right bundle branch cake is a predictor of mortality in myocardial infarction, heart failure, and sure centre blocks. In asymptomatic patients, isolated correct bundle branch block typically does not demand further evaluation.[four]

Etiology

Due to the anatomy of the right package branch, damage typically occurs at 3 dissimilar locations. The proximal right parcel nearest the endocardium is the most common location to exist affected. The distal right bundle is typically only injured when the moderator band is transected during surgery. The concluding correct bundle is injured during ventriculotomy or transatrial resection.[5]

A correct parcel branch cake is typically caused past illness processes that change the myocardium of the correct bundle co-operative, for example, structural changes, trauma, and infiltrative processes. Rarely, hyperkalemia can modify the conduction physiology by slowing electrical impulse conduction through cardiac tissue, causing a right parcel branch block.[6] Infections such as myocarditis or myocardial infarction can crusade directly cellular damage to the right package branch.[ii] Increased correct intraventricular force per unit area, either acutely by pulmonary embolism or chronically as in cor pulmonale, can stretch the right bundle co-operative causing a bundle branch cake.[7] RBBB tin also be induced iatrogenically from right heart catheterizations and by ethanol ablation for a septal reduction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.[three][8] Idiopathic fibrosis and calcification of the conduction system, called Lenegre's disease or Lev's illness, is a less common cause of right parcel co-operative block but most commonly occurs in the elderly.[ix][10] In patients with underlying eye affliction causing degeneration of the conduction pathway, a tachycardia dependent bundle co-operative cake can occur. This happens when the heart rate reaches an elevated rate and becomes uncoupled from the refractory menstruum, thus blocking the adjacent electrical stimuli downwards the right parcel branch.[11]

Epidemiology

Right parcel branch block is generally a slowly progressive degenerative disease of the myocardium. The incidence of right packet branch block typically increases with age, with up to 11.3% of people by historic period 80. In that location is no significant association with cardiac disease, ischemic heart affliction or cardiac risk factors.[12]

Pathophysiology

When the right bundle branch is interrupted, electrical stimuli from the atrioventricular (AV) node conducts to the packet of His and down the left packet branch. The left ventricle depolarizes first while the correct ventricle polarized later, causing the characteristic ECG findings.[13]

History and Physical

Right parcel branch block is usually asymptomatic and is typically found incidentally on ECG. The ECG finding itself does not cause any signs or symptoms. On concrete exam, the patient may have a split 2d heart sound.[fourteen]

Evaluation

The characteristic ECG findings for correct bundle branch block are as follows:

1. QRS duration is greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds

2. In lead V1 and V2, there is an RSR` in leads V1 and V2

3. In Leads 1 and V6, the S moving ridge is of greater elapsing than the R wave, or the Due south wave is greater than 40 milliseconds

4. In Leads V5 and V6, there is a normal R moving ridge summit fourth dimension

5. In Lead V1, the R moving ridge peak time is greater than 50 milliseconds

T waves tend to exist discordant to the terminal QRS vector. This results in inverted T waves in the right precordial leads and upright T waves in the left precordial leads.[fifteen]

Treatment / Direction

More often than not, the isolated presence of a right packet branch cake is asymptomatic and does not crave further evaluation or treatment. In the setting of eye failure with a low ventricular ejection fraction in combination with a right parcel branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy is indicated.[16]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for right parcel branch cake includes incomplete left bundle branch block, ventricular tachycardia, and Brugada syndrome. Incomplete right packet branch block has similar electrocardiographic features with a QRS elapsing of 100 to 119 milliseconds. Ventricular tachycardia or an accelerated idioventricular rhythm can have a similar advent to a right bundle branch cake if the dominant pacemaker originates from the ventricles. Brugada syndrome has an ECG similar to that of a correct package branch block.[17]

In patients who take a pacemaker in place and accept a QRS circuitous with right bundle branch cake morphology, evaluation needs to be performed for correct ventricular lead perforation or adventitious left ventricular lead placement.[18]

Prognosis

In patients without significant heart disease, correct parcel branch cake does not have any additional chance. In patients with cardiovascular disease, right parcel branch block is an contained hazard factor for all-cause mortality. The presence of a right packet co-operative cake before astute myocardial infarction, during an astute MI and post-MI, are all associated with higher mortality rates. In heart failure, the presence of a right bundle branch block has also been associated with increased mortality.[xix]

Pearls and Other Issues

In myocardial infarction, the presence of a left bundle co-operative cake alters the conduction arrangement in such a manner that makes the ST segments of the electrocardiogram difficult to interpret. The presence of a right bundle branch cake does not bear upon the ST segments in the same style that a left package branch block does, and thus does not interfere with the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.[20]

In patients with a left bundle co-operative block, special care needs to be taken when undergoing a right heart catheterization as there is an increased chance of consummate heart block due to the increased gamble of iatrogenically induced RBBB.[iii]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

ECGS are regularly washed in clinical practice and sometimes the main care provider, nurse practitioner and the internist may come up across a patient with a RBBB. In isolation and in an asymptomatic patient, RBBB is beneficial. However, the patient should exist referred to a cardiologist to ensure that he or she has no heart affliction. In patients wih CHF and RBBB, cardiac resynchronization therapy is indicated.[xvi] The outlook after handling is fair but without treatment, nigh patients accept a poro quality of life and a shortened life bridge.

Review Questions

Figure

Electrocardiogram of a patient with pulmonary embolism showing sinus tachycardia of approximately 150 beats per infinitesimal and right packet co-operative cake. Contributed past Wikimedia Commons, Walter Serra, Giuseppe De Iaco, Claudio Reverberi and Tiziano Gherli (more than...)

Effigy

First degree Av block with Correct Package Co-operative Cake. Contributed by Dhaval Desai, Physician

References

1.

Tusscher KH, Panfilov AV. Modelling of the ventricular conduction system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008 Jan-Apr;96(1-iii):152-lxx. [PubMed: 17910889]

two.

Sarda L, Colin P, Boccara F, Daou D, Lebtahi R, Faraggi M, Nguyen C, Cohen A, Slama MS, Steg PG, Le Guludec D. Myocarditis in patients with clinical presentation of myocardial infarction and normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 01;37(3):786-92. [PubMed: 11693753]

3.

Patil AR. Risk of right bundle-co-operative block and complete heart block during pulmonary avenue catheterization. Crit Care Med. 1990 January;xviii(1):122-3. [PubMed: 2293963]

4.

Rotman M, Triebwasser JH. A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch cake. Apportionment. 1975 Mar;51(three):477-84. [PubMed: 1132086]

5.

Horowitz LN, Alexander JA, Edmunds LH. Postoperative right packet branch block: identification of three levels of cake. Apportionment. 1980 Aug;62(2):319-28. [PubMed: 7397974]

half dozen.

Ohmae Thou, Rabkin SW. Hyperkalemia-induced bundle co-operative cake and consummate center cake. Clin Cardiol. 1981 Jan;iv(i):43-6. [PubMed: 7226590]

7.

Stein PD, Matta F, Sabra MJ, Treadaway B, Vijapura C, Warren R, Joshi P, Sadiq 1000, Kofoed JT, Hughes P, Chabala SD, Keyes DC, Kakish East, Hughes MJ. Relation of electrocardiographic changes in pulmonary embolism to correct ventricular enlargement. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 15;112(12):1958-61. [PubMed: 24075285]

8.

Agarwal Southward, Tuzcu EM, Desai MY, Smedira North, Lever HM, Lytle BW, Kapadia SR. Updated meta-analysis of septal alcohol ablation versus myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(viii):823-34. [PubMed: 20170823]

9.

LENEGRE J. ETIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF BILATERAL Package BRANCH BLOCK IN RELATION TO COMPLETE HEART Cake. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1964 Mar;6:409-44. [PubMed: 14153648]

10.

LEV One thousand. ANATOMIC BASIS FOR ATRIOVENTRICULAR Cake. Am J Med. 1964 November;37:742-8. [PubMed: 14237429]

11.

Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, Amat-y-leon F, Wyndham C, Rosen KM. Eectrophysiological observations in pateints with rate dependent parcel co-operative cake. Circulation. 1975 February;51(2):244-l. [PubMed: 1112004]

12.

Eriksson P, Hansson PO, Eriksson H, Dellborg M. Bundle-co-operative cake in a general male person population: the study of men born 1913. Circulation. 1998 Dec 01;98(22):2494-500. [PubMed: 9832497]

13.

Arnsdorf MF. The cellular basis of cardiac arrhythmias. A matrical perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;601:263-fourscore. [PubMed: 2221691]

14.

LEATHAM A. Splitting of the first and second heart sounds. Lancet. 1954 Sep 25;267(6839):607-14. [PubMed: 13202450]

xv.

Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Gorgels A, Hancock EW, Josephson Thou, Kligfield P, Kors JA, Macfarlane P, Mason JW, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Pahlm O, Rautaharju PM, van Herpen G, Wagner GS, Wellens H., American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology. American College of Cardiology Foundation. Centre Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and estimation of the electrocardiogram: function 3: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific argument from the American Heart Clan Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17;53(11):976-81. [PubMed: 19281930]

16.

Bilchick KC, Kamath S, DiMarco JP, Stukenborg GJ. Parcel-branch block morphology and other predictors of effect after cardiac resynchronization therapy in Medicare patients. Apportionment. 2010 Nov xvi;122(20):2022-30. [PMC free article: PMC3659803] [PubMed: 21041691]

17.

Gussak I, Antzelevitch C, Bjerregaard P, Towbin JA, Chaitman BR. The Brugada syndrome: clinical, electrophysiologic and genetic aspects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jan;33(i):5-15. [PubMed: 9935001]

18.

Okmen Eastward, Erdinler I, Oguz E, Akyol A, Turek O, Cam N, Ulufer T. An electrocardiographic algorithm for determining the location of pacemaker electrode in patients with correct bundle branch cake configuration during permanent ventricular pacing. Angiology. 2006 Oct-Nov;57(v):623-30. [PubMed: 17067986]

19.

Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ, Manson JE, Cain ME, Martin LW, Bavry AA, Mehta L, Vitolins M, Prineas RJ. Mortality risk associated with bundle branch blocks and related repolarization abnormalities (from the Women's Health Initiative [WHI]). Am J Cardiol. 2012 November 15;110(x):1489-95. [PubMed: 22858187]

20.

Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, Josephson M, Gorgels A, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Surawicz B, Kligfield P, Childers R, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Deal BJ, Gorgels A, Hancock EW, Kors JA, Stonemason JW, Okin P, Rautaharju PM, van Herpen Yard., American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Commission, Council on Clinical Cardiology. American Higher of Cardiology Foundation. Middle Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and estimation of the electrocardiogram: role Half-dozen: astute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Commission, Quango on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Gild. Endorsed by the International Lodge for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17;53(eleven):1003-11. [PubMed: 19281933]

gallagherwasioneating.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507872/